Case study · Financial services

Coaching that ends with the work automated.

A team had sat through vendor training and come away with little. Mark Lucas took a different path: hands-on coaching on the work they actually do every day. It grew into working side by side, automating their own tasks together. By the end, one task that took 40 hours by hand was running in minutes.

ClientGlobal financial-services firm (anonymized)
EngagementHands-on Power Platform coaching and enablement
RoleLead coach and consultant, Mark Lucas
StackMicrosoft Power Platform · 30 years on the Microsoft stack
~40 hrs

to do the task by hand, before

Minutes

to run it now, after

Built by
the team

not handed over, so the skill stays

The approach

Coach on real work, not demos.

The team had been talked at for hours in earlier vendor training and built almost nothing. Mark flipped it. Every session used their actual workflows, hands on keyboard from the first minute. No slides, no hypotheticals.

It grew from there. What started as scheduled sessions turned into Mark working side by side with people, sitting with each one and automating the tasks that were quietly eating their week. The coaching and the building were the same activity.

"Their earlier training from a major software vendor stalled on technical issues. We spent the whole session troubleshooting instead of learning to build." — Process engineer, global financial-services firm
The result

They built it, so they own it.

By the end of the engagement, team members were building and deploying their own automations instead of waiting on a small internal platform team. One task makes the point. A complex, recurring job that used to take roughly 40 hours by hand now finishes in minutes, and the person who runs it built it during the coaching.

"This used to take me about 40 hours by hand. Now it runs in minutes." — Process engineer, global financial-services firm
Why it sticks

Mark doesn't build a tool and walk away. Because the work was theirs and their hands were on the keyboard, the capability stays after he's gone. Automate the mechanical part, leave the judgment with the expert, and the team keeps building on their own. That's the difference between a deliverable and a team that levels up.

The industry backs this up
  • 60–70%of employee time sits on activities AI and automation can take over today (McKinsey, The Economic Potential of Generative AI, 2023).
  • 224% ROIon Power Platform, payback under six months (Forrester TEI, commissioned by Microsoft, 2024).
  • 200 hrs/yrsaved per employee on repetitive work (same study).
  • 20% fasterdevelopment by cutting custom code (same study).
Why this travels
  • Any team buried in repeatable manual work is a fit, no matter the industry.
  • Coaching happens on the team's real tasks, so the value shows up in week one.
  • People keep the skill and keep automating after the engagement ends.

Want to find the 40-hour task hiding in your firm?

Start with a 90-Minute AI Audit. In ninety minutes you'll have a prioritized roadmap of the automations worth building first, ranked by the hours and dollars each one gives back.

Book your 90-Minute AI Audit

← Back to JamesTech